Test Inspector · by Astaqc

Your QA budget is paying for repetition, not quality

Manual regression means paying skilled testers to click the same flows every release. Test Inspector generates those tests once from plain English, then runs them nightly for the cost of compute.

Calculate my savings on a call 15-minute demo · no credit card

Built by Astaqc Consulting — over a million QA hours delivered · 92% client retention

$0
Yearly cost of manual regression
$0
Typical first-year saving with Test Inspector

Assumes $35/hr blended QA rate and 70% of regression automated — drag the slider to match your team.

70%
of manual regression typically automated in month one
90s
from plain-English prompt to a running test
$0
spent writing or maintaining test code
Where the money goes

Three costs that disappear

1

Manual regression cycles

Days of click-through before each release become a nightly automated run with a report waiting in the morning.

2

Automation engineers' backlog

No framework to build or maintain. PMs and manual QA describe flows in chat; the AI writes validated steps.

3

Escaped-bug firefighting

UI, API, accessibility, and security checks on every deploy catch regressions before your customers do.

Bring your QA invoice to the demo

We'll map your current manual effort to an automated suite and show you the number, live.

Book the 15-minute call No credit card required. Keep the generated tests either way.
Ask our AI assistant…